I find it interesting that Match.com has agreed to start implementing this process, but they seem very nonchalant about the case and even hesitant to screen users. The article on Mashable.com said, "although the site’s officials still don’t think that screening is the best option to prevent cases such as this one. We want to stress that while these checks may help in certain instances, they remain highly flawed, and it is critical that this effort does not provide a false sense of security to our members." It seems as though they are making excuses for future incidents. As if they are saying, "We will implement this process, but if it happens again it's not our fault because we're doing what you wanted."
I understand that Match.com wants it's users to understand that screening won't prevent everything that could ever happen. However, I feel that screening users will make those who were hesitant to join before comfortable with joining, and even make current users feel more comfortable. It could even increase their traffic on their website and usage - which is beneficial for Match.com.
My question is: do you think it's a good idea for dating sites to screen their users? And although we understand it might not prevent all incidents, would it make you more comfortable about joining a dating site knowing they screen for sexual predators?